<p> And their parts, and from here conclusions as concerning similarity, and distinction in details and as a whole already followed. As we saw above, Bjuffon considered that separate individuals of one kind always differ from each other on a number of details that all of them as though uncountable variations of the same specific type. In a similar way and similar kinds of one family it is possible to consider as modification of one general type of family. Further we will more in detail stop on such understanding of family. It is essential that similarity of kinds of one family Bjuffon explains a generality of their origin, hence, it and is the reason of a generality of their type. It seemed, it would be possible to argue and rather higher regular units, ascending above to one general ancestor of all animals as about it speaks Bjuffon in the head about a donkey. However from care and, possibly, first of all scientific, in the absence of the actual bases for such constructions, Bjuffon further families on this way does not go. Initial kinds concerning far families, "the first individuals of each kind of animals and plants", on Bjuffonu, "are created" by god; so he at least writes in the head about a bull and in other places. These protogenic prototypes of kinds can, as we already know, to vary from generation to generation depending on "circumstances". Changes can be different. They basically can be regarded or as degradation, "degeneration", i.e. Deterioration of qualities of individuals of the given kind or, on the contrary, improvement of qualities, "improvement" of individuals. So, for example, speaking about goats, Bjuffon declares:" Instead of imagining that these minor kinds have arisen only by a degeneration of primary kinds instead of considering a donkey as a degrading horse, would be more bases to tell that a horse - an advanced donkey... Also that in general more perfective aspects, especially from pets, have arisen from kinds of less perfect wild animals, to them of the closest "(in the same place, p. 359). In the spirit of these words, apparently, it is necessary to understand the statement of Bjuffona of 1777 concerning" a prototype "the person: arguing on the Asian people and, in particular," Tatars "," Bjuffon writes: "their Prototype, or, perhaps, a caricature, is found in the name of Kalmyks, ugliest of all people". </p>
Snova poiski <p> The Idea of unity of "plan" of the organic nature thanks to clearness and brightness of its expression in work of Bjuffona and to a wide circulation of this book became known for much and should affect scientific thought of that epoch. Vick d'Azir takes this idea as a principle all researches in the field of comparative anatomy and in places formulates it almost that words of Bjuffona (p. 78 present books see). Zhoffrua Sent-Iler has made its main idea of all scientific activity, directly specifying in influence of Bjuffona (p. 219 present books see). And some other </p>
